Some comments strike me as odd. Then I wonder, am I ‘further evolved’ or are others just ‘devolving’?
Usually my “Unanswered Question” posts are inspired by something I see or read. Today it was something I happened to read.
A blogger was discussing her new ‘Mental Health Therapy’ and admitted that she’d already doubted it would work for her because the therapist is a man. That struck me as odd but clearly an ‘in vogue’ viewpoint. Immutable traits are now given an awful lot of attention.
Last night, I also heard about medical universities, in an effort of “inclusion”, suggesting everyone should be treated by physicians and surgeons who are the same race and gender as the patient. As someone who had long ago become ‘blind’ to people’s immutable traits, I again wondered, “Am I the oddball?”. Doesn’t everyone want skilled professionals treating them? What does skin color or gender or sexual orientation have to do with that?
The worst part of my stream of thought was realizing that the modern day ‘sifting and sorting’ of people into groups is ultimately affecting me too. I don’t like it!
I’ve long admired Douglas Murray for his intellect and confidence. Recently, it came to my attention that he’s gay. “Ugh, so what?” was my first thought. Another person I’ve admired and enjoyed listening to is Rick Grennell, who was our ambassador to Germany and acting DNI during the Trump administration. He’s also been identified as gay. Those two fine intelligent men were already on my most admired list. Again, I thought, “What difference is knowing their sexuality supposed make? “
Then, it happened! I was trying to recall something brilliant that Douglas Murray had said, and my mind injected the thought, “You know. That Gay intellectual you admire.” Not only was I surprised, but I was also disgusted. The widespread superficial ‘labeling virus’ had infected me.
All this ‘intersectionality’ crap is counterproductive to unity to say the least. Worse, is the total lack of self-awareness those who are tossing it around have. The same people who keep suggesting that everyone needs to be more tolerant and inclusive, clearly want to emphasize our ‘unimportant differences’ to a point that no one pays attention to our ‘important gifts and talents and similarities’.
Doesn’t tolerance and inclusion require ‘connection’? Our humanity is already our connection to each other and the only one we ought to pay attention to, IMHO. Those suggesting we need to pay a great deal of attention to anything else, are not at all trying to unify people. Their underlying purpose clearly is to segregate us and they’re doing well now that they can infect the minds of those who have already further evolved.
6 thoughts on “Unanswered Question: Doesn’t tolerance and inclusion require ‘connection’?”
I hate it! I would prefer NOT to know what anyone does sexually, except for fictional characters. It’s so annoying to constantly hear about people’s sexual preferences and pronouns. Rawr! 😡
Glad to hear that you’re an oddball too. 🤣❤
If a person can do the job right, nothing else matters.
Absolutely used to mean a lot to have skills and personal integrity… not any more. 😢
Thanks, John. We’re all in this together. ❤
Susan, once more you find me in complete agreement.
And don’t let me get started about the patient/doctor bs…as someone who has treated a fair amount of patients for +30 years, I believe I know what I’m talking about.
A little story, to lighten the mood:
– years ago I had an abbess (Mother Superior) visiting my practice for treatment; because of her status I made an exception and asked a female colleague to handle her treatment.
One week later, she asked to see me; she wanted me to carry on with her treatment. Reason being she could listen to me talking to my patients and that was in dire contrast to her own female therapist.
And so I did.
So you see dear Susan, all these idiosyncrasies we are witnessing nowadays are beyond nonsense.
🙏❤ Thank-you for your thoughts and anecdote. I’m confident we’re in the majority in our opinion on nonsense. Speaking up is our only hope. 😉